Five stars are very good:) but seven stars are perfection. That’s my summation of the ranger versus the ranger 2.0, the new Ranger, I like the leasing system, and the way it comes very forward to the toebox and the spacing of the leasing system, and the gray soul{That combination gives it the nostalgia of the 70s while simultaneously a 21st century, modern future design} I currently have six pair of the Rangers two of them are the ranger 2.0. The first Ranger the toebox area was more oblique more ergonomic more bio~mechanically correct ergonomically “Amalgamated-unitized” for human beings feet, the forefoot and toebox , is suited for a range of foot/feet type. The new Ranger is good but basically it is not as wide in the toebox4foot area. “All in all” the BeLnka ranger is good. P.S. I am a connoisseur of footwear that is designed for the humankind, of inhabitants of the earth,’:-D