You may also like
Recently viewed
I’ve had my eye on these for a while and they are so worth it! I love the style and color. They remind me of sorrels, but so much better. The design keeps them from looking super wide at the toe, but I have plenty of room. They are warm, but not overly warm. I like the ability to use the laces for a custom fit. Really glad I got these!
I’m not sure about the fit yet but I do love them!
Five stars are very good:) but seven stars are perfection. That’s my summation of the ranger versus the ranger 2.0, the new Ranger, I like the leasing system, and the way it comes very forward to the toebox and the spacing of the leasing system, and the gray soul{That combination gives it the nostalgia of the 70s while simultaneously a 21st century, modern future design} I currently have six pair of the Rangers two of them are the ranger 2.0. The first Ranger the toebox area was more oblique more ergonomic more bio~mechanically correct ergonomically “Amalgamated-unitized” for human beings feet, the forefoot and toebox , is suited for a range of foot/feet type. The new Ranger is good but basically it is not as wide in the toebox4foot area. “All in all” the BeLnka ranger is good. P.S. I am a connoisseur of footwear that is designed for the humankind, of inhabitants of the earth,’:-D
These are nice shoes! I've used them for some cold and wet hiking and they've held up well. The sole has a surprising amount of traction. I do wish the fleece lining was real wool so that they'd breathe better, but wearing wool socks helps a lot. My main issue was with sizing. My feet are 22.9 cm and I bought a 37, thinking 10mm extra space in the front would be sufficient. But I think the measurements might be a little off; my big toe often touches the front of the shoe, so they feel a bit too small. I recommend going one size bigger than you think you need.